
A critically endangered primate population recovered from 50 to more than 160 for $20,000 a year, because the project was built around governance the community already had.
Read the Case Study
Revenue flowed, training was delivered, and every indicator looked good, but decision-making authority sat with the safari company, not the community whose land it was.
Read the Case Study
Nearly $150 million committed, rigorous carbon baselines, and genuine community engagement across 2.4 million hectares in northern Mozambique, but a single act of political corruption stopped the project cold.
Read the Case Study
Rigorous science, sound boundaries, and a UNESCO Biosphere Reserve designation, but the communities who depend on the ecosystem didn't write the rules governing it.
Read the Case Study